United States vs. Sokolow

This case was approximately a guy Andrew Sokolow who was searches and investigated at the detonating device of Hawaii airport because of his appearance and his activity. He nonrecreational for devil air lane roundtrip tickets in property from a 20 dollar summit roll, he was exhausting a dingy jumpsuit and coin handcuffs, he traveled under a different spend a penny from that on his seat phone number and he never checked whatever of his 4 bags. The person that sold him the tickets account him to the DEA affirming that he researched nervous and suspicious and on his musical mode stern to Honolulu, Sokolow was tour of duty and searched.         My opinion for this case is split in two, even though I am leaning more(prenominal) towards the opinion of the lawcourt. Sokolows appearance and behavior would look a little suspicious. First of wholly he looked nervous, he acted nervous and the fact that he paid 2100 dollars in cash which is non very c ommon and did non check his bags does front a little suspicious. I agree with the opinion of the court that firing on a 20 hour evasion to Miami for a short term of 48 hours and then feeler back doesnt seem amend. Even though I take over to consider that many people go on a far business trip for a day or two and they come back, alone they take for grantedt look doubtful. Sokolow was non a very smart man. If you feel you ar involve in illegal activities and you are about to impart cocaine through the airport dont be so obvious and stupid. He paid in cash, he put on a jumpsuit and atomic number 79 chains and when he came back to the airport he wore the like garments and was easily recognized. The DEA is responsible and they should check anything that seems mistrustful. I dont think that the DEA violated his privacy by letting the move sniff his bags because sniff of checked luggage is non a search. A sniff is allowed in a public airport. after a trained narcotics dog positive alert to baggage for! narcotics, officers have probable cause to seize the baggage and be compact search indorsement. The only mistake that the investigators did is that they did not stop him inside the airport but outside on the sidewalk. That could be considered as invading of privacy.         In the other hand I do believe that everyone has the right to wear anything they want.

Just because Sokolow was wearing a black jumpsuit and was paying in cash does not mean he was a drug trader or he was smuggling drugs. May be that was his excerpt of dress up and he was very rich and had that more money in cash on him. E ven though I serene think it doesnt look right, you never know what mental of stile one has. The thing that gave him up however the most, wan not the way he was dressed but the way e was acting. He was nervous, he was constantly expression around and those are the signs of suspicion on the airports. If you are carrying something that you should not have been carrying on the airport, you have to be calm and relaxed and hail-fellow in posture of worried and nervous.         In conclusion I can say that appearance doesnt always result to suspicion, however in that respect are many factors tangled and putting all those factors in concert the DEA had every right to sniff Sokolows luggage and get a warrant to search it. If you want to get a full essay, assure it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay